Next UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan, Sat, Oct 31 (Moicano vs. Nolan)Results UFC 333Alexander Volkanovski def. Movsar EvloevPetr Yan def. Merab DvalishviliLone'er Kavanagh def. Ramazan TemirovAlexander Volkov def. Rizvan KunievAaron Pico def. Losene KeitaDominick Reyes def. Azamat Murzakanov
Opinion

Israel Adesanya Says the Losing Ends Now. Here's Why I'm Betting Against Him

Adesanya has signed a UFC bout agreement and insists his four-fight skid is over, which means the sportsbooks are about to make a very familiar mistake.

Israel Adesanya
Photo: Israel Adesanya: MMMAnytt, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Israel Adesanya has signed a UFC bout agreement, and according to Yahoo Sports he’s promising that his four-fight losing streak ends with this one. The report doesn’t name an opponent, a date or a venue. All we have is a signature and a vow, and in my experience that’s the exact combination that makes oddsmakers go soft and price a guy like it’s still his championship era.

I know how the next part goes because I’ve watched it happen to a dozen faded stars. The matchup gets announced, the line opens, and the former two-time middleweight champion shows up as a favorite. The other corner barely matters. The public bets names, and books lean their lines toward where the public money is going to land. Call it bookkeeping. If a sportsbook knows most of the tickets are coming in on the famous guy, it has every reason to charge the famous guy’s fans a little extra for the privilege.

The only number I need right now

The stat is 0-4, and Adesanya brought it up himself. I’m not going to quote you his strike differentials or his absorbed-per-minute numbers from those fights, because the report doesn’t carry them and I’m not in the business of making up figures to win an argument. I don’t need them yet anyway. A fighter who has lost four straight has a problem that keeps getting found, and when somebody tells you it’s fixed before you’ve seen a single round of evidence, the burden of proof sits with him.

The math is where the trouble starts for anyone laying chalk. Say he opens at -180. That price implies he wins about 64.3% of the time. At -200 you’re paying for a 66.7% fighter. At a modest -150 you’re still betting he wins 60% of these. So ask yourself an honest question. On a four-fight skid, is this guy a two-out-of-three proposition against a ranked opponent? Because that’s what the number would be claiming, and nothing in his last four results says it.

Flip it around. If the opponent comes back at +150, the book is telling you that guy wins 40% of the time. On a fighter who has lost four in a row, I’d want to see a pretty bad matchup before I believed the dog is that far behind.

What makes a live dog here

I’m not saying fade Adesanya against anybody with a pulse. I’m saying fade him against a specific type. The guy I want is someone who walks forward, throws in volume and makes the fight ugly in the third round. Here’s my checklist for when the opponent gets named:

  • Pace. Does the opponent land at a higher clip than he absorbs, and does that output hold or rise late in fights?
  • Defense trend. Compare Adesanya’s strikes absorbed in his last four fights against his career average. If that number has climbed, you have your answer.
  • Grappling threat. Anyone who can force him to defend takedowns and burn energy against the fence is worth a long look.
  • Layoff. If there’s a long gap between his last fight and this one, my interest in the dog goes up again. I have a firm rule about laying short odds on long layoffs, and it was paid for with my own money.

A counterpuncher who wants to trade single shots at range is the wrong guy to back here. That’s the fight a gifted striker can still win on his worst night. The pressure fighter is a different matter. Volume tests defense, and defense is usually the first thing that goes when a run like this starts.

The case for him, and why I’m not buying

The best argument for Adesanya is that elite talent doesn’t simply evaporate, and a fighter with a two-title résumé might be one adjustment away from looking like himself again. That’s fair, and I’ll grant it. But you don’t get paid for talent the market already knows about. Every bettor on earth has seen his highlight reel. The talent is baked into the line, and probably overbaked. What the line will underprice is the possibility that four losses in a row are telling the truth, which is the part nobody wants to hear about a former champion.

Redemption stories are wonderful television and lousy handicapping. I’ve lost more money on “he’s due” than on any other two words in the English language, and I still have the ticket stubs to prove it. A fighter swearing the losing stops proves he wants it. It says nothing about whether his defense has come back.

So my position for now is to wait. No opponent, no line, no bet. When the UFC announces who’s standing across from him, I’ll look at that guy’s pace numbers before I even glance at Adesanya’s. If it’s a volume fighter getting plus money, I’ll be on the dog, and I’ll be fine with the hate mail.

Sources: Yahoo Sports

Keep reading