Next UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Nolan, Sat, Oct 31 (Moicano vs. Nolan)Results UFC 333Alexander Volkanovski def. Movsar EvloevPetr Yan def. Merab DvalishviliLone'er Kavanagh def. Ramazan TemirovAlexander Volkov def. Rizvan KunievAaron Pico def. Losene KeitaDominick Reyes def. Azamat Murzakanov
Opinion

Paul Heyman Blames Brock Lesnar's Colon for Every UFC Loss, and UFC 81 Says Otherwise

Heyman told Graham Bensinger that a healthy Lesnar would still hold UFC gold at 49 and that no heavyweight alive would see Round 2 against him.

Brock Lesnar
Photo: Brock Lesnar: Diego Serrano, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Paul Heyman wants you to believe a gut condition is the only thing that ever beat Brock Lesnar in the UFC. The record does a lot of the arguing against him.

Heyman, Lesnar’s longtime friend and manager, sat down for In Depth with Graham Bensinger and went all in on the bit. According to him, diverticulitis (inflammation of bulging pouches in the wall of the large intestine, the kind of thing MMA Mania noted gets described as a “shotgun blast to the stomach”) is the lone reason his guy isn’t still holding the heavyweight title at 49.

“If he didn’t have diverticulitis, he would have never been defeated in the UFC,” Heyman told Bensinger. “Never. Never. He’d still be champion today at 49. There’s nobody on this planet that could hang with him, no one. No one. No one. No one would get out of the first round with him. There’s no way.”

He said no one four times in that stretch. I counted. Heyman has never been accused of underselling.

The Problem Starts in 2008

The cleanest hole in the theory is Frank Mir. Lesnar fought Mir at UFC 81 in early 2008 and lost, and that happened well before diverticulitis entered the conversation. MMA Mania took a sarcastic swipe at the usual excuse for that one, which is to blame referee Steve Mazzagatti. Fine. Blame the ref if you want. A loss with a referee controversy attached still goes in the loss column, and it still happened to a Lesnar whose intestines were apparently in fine working order.

So the idea that he’d never have lost in the UFC dies on the first loss on his record. You don’t need a medical degree for this. You need a Wikipedia tab.

MMA Mania summed up the logic gap better than I could: diverticulitis, by Heyman’s accounting, only shows up in defeats. When Lesnar wins, he’s an unstoppable monster. When he loses, it’s the colon. That’s a pretty convenient illness.

The Comeback Doesn’t Help

Then there’s UFC 200. Several years after his health scare, Lesnar came back to fight Mark Hunt, and by his own account going in, he felt great. He won a unanimous decision over the Super Samoan. That result got overturned to a No Contest after Lesnar failed his drug test.

Think about what that does to Heyman’s argument. The one time we got a post-diverticulitis Lesnar who said he was healthy and ready, the round-one demolition never came. Hunt went the distance. Nobody got finished in the first, and the win itself got wiped off the books. If Heyman’s first-round claim were anywhere near true, a fully healthy Lesnar against Hunt was the fight to prove it.

After that, Lesnar resurfaced briefly for some post-fight drama and then went back to WWE for the rest of his career. His official UFC record, per MMA Mania, sits at 5-3. Three losses in eight decisions, plus a No Contest that came with a failed test. That’s the résumé Heyman is calling unbeatable.

Why Heyman Says This Stuff Anyway

I’ll give Heyman this much. He is doing his job. The man has spent decades as the guy at the microphone telling you his client is the scariest human on Earth, and he’s great at it. In the same Bensinger interview, he got into why Roman Reigns was the only act he could have followed Lesnar with.

“Because there is no one else I could have followed up my run with Brock Lesnar with than Roman Reigns,” Heyman said, per Fightful’s transcription. He also talked about trying to lure Ric Flair into fighting him, which tells you how much of this conversation lives in wrestling logic.

That’s the frame to read the Lesnar claim in. It’s a promo. In a promo, your guy never loses clean, the ref always screwed him, and the only thing that ever hurt him was a disease. Heyman is cutting a promo at you, and he’d probably take that as a compliment.

And look, I love heavyweights. I loved Lesnar as a heavyweight attraction. A giant who made weight at the UFC 100 weigh-ins at Mandalay Bay in July 2009 and looked like he was built in a lab is exactly the kind of thing that sells me a ticket. The fights were chaos and the crowds were electric. You don’t need to rewrite history to say that.

But saying he’d still be champion today at 49 is a different claim, and it falls apart on contact. The Mir loss came before the illness. The Hunt fight came after it, with Lesnar saying he felt fantastic, and it ended in a decision that got erased. Neither one fits Heyman’s story.

The heavyweight division doesn’t owe Brock Lesnar a hypothetical title reign. It already gave him a real one, and the record has the rest. If Heyman wants to keep arguing, the UFC 81 tape is still out there.

Keep reading