Next UFC Fight Night: Cortes Acosta vs. Walker, Sat, Nov 7 (Acosta vs. Walker)Results UFC Fight NightTom Nolan def. Renato MoicanoJacobe Smith def. Randy BrownCody Durden def. Ode' OsbourneLuana Santos def. Yana SantosJean-Paul Lebosnoyani def. Farman HasanovDakota Hope def. Francis Marshall
Opinion

Darren Till Calls Daniel Cormier a Company Man, and the Latest Tape Says Otherwise

Till told The MMA Hour that Cormier is always biased toward anyone named Magomedov, then admitted he'd never say it to DC's face.

Darren Till
Photo: Darren Till: Anything Goes With James English, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Darren Till didn’t come to The MMA Hour to make friends. In the clips Ariel Helwani posted to X on Monday, the former UFC title challenger called Jake Paul a juicehead and a fraud. He said he’d been two weeks into camp for a December 24 fight with Paul before the Cédric Doumbé bout was announced out from under him. He offered John Fury an apology of sorts, which mostly turned into another round of insults about his weight. In the middle of all that, Till turned on the commentary booth and Daniel Cormier.

“Any guy who’s got the second name ‘Magomedov’, he’s just always biased,” Till said. “He’s a company man... I can smell that bullshit from over this corner of the world. I’ve got no time for that whatsoever.”

It’s a good line, and Till is very good at good lines. The trouble is that it arrived without a single piece of evidence attached. No fight was named and no call was cited. There was no round where Cormier supposedly tilted the room toward one guy. Commentary shapes how casual viewers understand what they just watched, so calling a broadcaster biased is a serious charge, and serious charges deserve receipts.

The surname problem

The surname part bothers me more than the company man part. Using one common last name as shorthand for an entire region’s worth of fighters flattens dozens of very different people into a single punchline. Those men came up in different rooms, under different coaches, with different styles, and plenty of them have never been near a UFC broadcast. If Till thinks Cormier oversells a specific fighter, he can say so, and he’d have a conversation worth having. Lumping them together by last name is a lazy shortcut, and Till is sharp enough to know better.

What a company man would have said Saturday

The timing of this is awkward for Till, because the most recent broadcast cuts hard against him. At UFC Vegas 123 on Saturday, referee Dan Miragliotta stood up the main event in Round 2 with Renato Moicano on Tom Nolan’s back, body triangle locked, hunting for a rear naked choke while the Meta APEX crowd booed. Nolan scored a knockdown shortly after and finished Moicano with ground and pound in the third round.

An announcer working for the house smooths that over. He talks up the winner, calls it a fun fight, and moves to the next segment. Cormier did the opposite on the company’s own post-fight show, as MMA Fighting reported. “I don’t care what anybody says, a referee error ultimately casts a little bit of a shadow over what was a beautiful performance by Tom Nolan,” he said. He went further and drew a hard line on officiating: “I just don’t think a ref should take anybody out of mount ever, should never take anybody off of the back like that.”

He also saw the obvious counterattack coming. Cormier said his objection had nothing to do with a wrestler’s fondness for grappling, and that getting to the back is simply so difficult that taking it away changes everything. You can disagree with him on the standup. Laura Sanko and Din Thomas both found it questionable too, so he wasn’t out on a limb alone. But a man who calls the main event of a UFC card a referee error, on a UFC broadcast, is plainly not reading from a corporate script.

Fair criticism exists. This one has no tape.

Cormier’s commentary does have critics, and some of them have a real platform. Dominick Reyes gave him a failing grade, an F-plus, for his work during Reyes’ own knockout of Azamat Murzakanov, according to MMA Fighting. Jacobe Smith, whom Cormier coaches, defended him by saying critics get butt-hurt when their careers aren’t going the way they want. Smith is obviously not a neutral witness. He trains under the man, and his defense should be weighed that way.

There’s a legitimate case to be made about Cormier in the booth. He’s loud, he’s emotional, and he gets swept up in moments. Some viewers find that exciting and others find it grating. That is a matter of taste, and taste is fair game. Saying he’s always biased toward one group of fighters by surname is a different claim entirely, and it needs tape to stand up.

The most human moment in Till’s whole rant came before any of it. “I wouldn’t say it to his face, mind you, because he’s a f***ing animal of a fighter,” he said. That’s an honest admission, and it’s funny, and it tells you Till respects what Cormier did inside the cage even while he trashes what Cormier does outside it. If he wants the rest of the argument to carry the same weight, he should bring one clip. Right now the most recent footage shows Cormier on Saturday night in Las Vegas, with boos still coming down from the APEX seats, telling the UFC’s audience that the UFC’s main event had been bent by a bad call.

Keep reading